RRedFlameDECISION CI
PROJECT APEXApproved Decision v3 → Candidate Evidence v4
REVIEW REQUIRED

EVIDENCE PULL REQUEST · PR-004

A changed fact should not leave an old decision behind.

Review the evidence, compile its financial consequences, and see exactly which investment assertions no longer hold.

2FAILED TESTS
1PASSED · UNAFFECTED
2STALE PARAGRAPHS
1IMPACT PATH

01 · CANDIDATE EVIDENCE

FY2030 Exit EBITDA

VALUE CHANGE
APPROVED V3$24.0m
→
CANDIDATE V4$20.0m
−16.7%
DEFINITION UNCHANGEDSame period · same USD millions unit · same Adjusted basis

Source · Management Model v4 · Cell F42 ↗

02 · EXECUTABLE POLICY

Decision Tests

DETERMINISTIC
Base-case MOIC ≥ 2.50xThreshold v1 · EVALUATED
FAIL
Base-case IRR ≥ 20%Threshold v1 · EVALUATED
FAIL
Top customer concentration ≤ 20%Threshold v1 · REUSED
UNAFFECTEDPASS

04 · AFFECTED WORK PRODUCT

IC Memo Assertions

2 STALE
MEMO-P4
Exit case

The base case assumes $24.0m of FY2030 Adjusted EBITDA at an 8.0x exit multiple.

STALE
MEMO-P7
Base-case returns

The base case clears the fund's 2.50x MOIC and 20% IRR hurdles.

STALE

03 · DECISION BLAST RADIUS

One fact, one traceable path

1 PATH
FY2030 Exit EBITDAINPUT
$24.00m$20.00m
Exit Enterprise ValueDERIVED
$192.00m$160.00m
Exit Equity ValueDERIVED
$180.00m$148.00m
Base-case MOICDERIVED · TESTED
3.00x2.47x
5-year IRRDERIVED · TESTED
24.57%19.79%
LOCKED INPUTS

8.0x exit multiple · $12m exit net debt · $60m entry equity · 5-year hold

WHY THIS IS DIFFERENT

Document AI updates words. RedFlame invalidates decisions.

DOCUMENT WORKFLOW

Detect update → regenerate memo

REDFLAME

Evidence → calculations → tests → assertions → human resolution

A source-backed adjacent-product capability matrix is included in the repository.