PROJECT APEXApproved Decision v3 → Candidate Evidence v4
REVIEW REQUIREDEVIDENCE PULL REQUEST · PR-004
A changed fact should not leave an old decision behind.
Review the evidence, compile its financial consequences, and see exactly which investment assertions no longer hold.
2FAILED TESTS
1PASSED · UNAFFECTED
2STALE PARAGRAPHS
1IMPACT PATH
01 · CANDIDATE EVIDENCE
FY2030 Exit EBITDA
APPROVED V3$24.0m
→
CANDIDATE V4$20.0m
−16.7%
DEFINITION UNCHANGEDSame period · same USD millions unit · same Adjusted basis
Source · Management Model v4 · Cell F42 ↗
02 · EXECUTABLE POLICY
Decision Tests
Base-case MOIC ≥ 2.50x
FAIL
Base-case IRR ≥ 20%
FAIL
Top customer concentration ≤ 20%
UNAFFECTEDPASS
04 · AFFECTED WORK PRODUCT
IC Memo Assertions
MEMO-P4
Exit case
STALEThe base case assumes $24.0m of FY2030 Adjusted EBITDA at an 8.0x exit multiple.
MEMO-P7
Base-case returns
STALEThe base case clears the fund's 2.50x MOIC and 20% IRR hurdles.
03 · DECISION BLAST RADIUS
One fact, one traceable path
FY2030 Exit EBITDAINPUT
$24.00m→$20.00m
Exit Enterprise ValueDERIVED
$192.00m→$160.00m
Exit Equity ValueDERIVED
$180.00m→$148.00m
Base-case MOICDERIVED · TESTED
3.00x→2.47x
5-year IRRDERIVED · TESTED
24.57%→19.79%
LOCKED INPUTS
8.0x exit multiple · $12m exit net debt · $60m entry equity · 5-year hold
WHY THIS IS DIFFERENT
Document AI updates words. RedFlame invalidates decisions.
DOCUMENT WORKFLOW
Detect update → regenerate memo
REDFLAME
Evidence → calculations → tests → assertions → human resolution
A source-backed adjacent-product capability matrix is included in the repository.